⚖️ A Constitutional Betrayal at the
Doorstep of 4 Crore Children
The CIC’s Role in Shielding Systemic Corruption
✍️ By:
Rajnish Ratnakar
Founder – RTI & Public Grievance Warriors of India
📚 Blog
URL: https://rtiandpublicgrievancewarriorsofindia.blogspot.com/2025/07/when-power-evades-accountability.html
📅 Case Timeline
- RTI Filed: 04.02.2024
- CPIO Reply: 28.02.2024
- First Appeal
Filed: 02.03.2024
- Hearing
Held: 26.05.2025
- Decision
Delivered: 29.05.2025
- CIC File
Number: CIC/DSELI/A/2024/613039
- Information
Commissioner: Hon’ble Anandi Ramalingam
📜 Information Sought
- Confirmation
of receipt of an email sent to the Secretary, DoSEL,
regarding RTE violations.
- Disclosure
of any action taken to halt the misuse of funds and
appointment of unqualified Anganwadi teachers by MoWCD.
- Copies of
any letters or directives issued in response.
🧾 CPIO’s Reply
“The
information sought does not cover under the definition of information under
Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005.”
This response blatantly
ignores the legal fact that emails and official actions are
explicitly covered under Section 2(f) of the RTI Act.
🕳️ FAA’s Role in Procedural Subversion
Despite a valid First Appeal,
the FAA’s order was deliberately hidden. Shockingly, a fraudulent
upload of an unrelated FAA decision was placed on the RTI portal. This
was done to shield the nodal CPIO and protect the
Secretary of DoSEL.
The Information Commissioner
falsely claimed the FAA order was “not on record”—a
direct violation of Section 19(6) of the RTI Act.
🧩 CIC’s Cryptic Dismissal
The IC dismissed the appeal citing:
- The “speculative
nature” of queries
- “No scope of
intervention” due to the appellant’s absence
This is not just procedural
evasion—it is a constitutional injury.
🚨 Legal and Constitutional Violations
|
Provision |
Nature of Breach |
|
Section 2(f), RTI Act |
Emails and actions are information; denial is unlawful |
|
Section 11, RTI Act |
Public interest disclosure ignored |
|
Section 19(6), RTI Act |
FAA’s mandatory timeline violated |
|
Section 11, RTE Act |
Unqualified educators breach ECCE obligations |
|
Article 21A, Constitution |
4 crore children denied quality foundational education |
|
NCTE Norms |
DPSE qualification bypassed by MoWCD |
🏫 Scale of Harm
- Anganwadi
Centres: ~13.96 lakh
- Children
Affected: ~4 crore
- Average
Strength per Centre: 50–60 children
- Training
Provided: Only 26 days to 6 months—not
DPSE-compliant
📌 Call to Action
🚨 Immediate
revocation of the Information Commissioner under Section 14 of
the RTI Act.
🎯
Launch a National ECCE Reform to align MoWCD with NCTE
standards.
🗳️
Mobilize the public to restore RTI’s constitutional mandate.
📢 Slogans for the Movement
🔥 "When Power Evades Accountability,
Democracy Deteriorates!"
📣 "4 Crore Children Betrayed – We Demand
Justice Now!"
🛡️ "RTI Is Our Right – We Will Not Be
Silenced!"
🏛️ "Restore Constitutional Order – Remove the
Complicit!"
📢 Read
the full exposé and join the movement for transparency and justice:
🔗 When
Power Evades Accountability – Blog by Rajnish Ratnakar
Comments
Post a Comment